When is fractional the right bridge?
When you need senior GTM judgement and a running system now, but the full-time CMO brief is still evolving, stage, channel mix, or team shape is not stable enough for a £150k hire.
Hiring
Fractional fits when you need the system and cadence without locking in a permanent exec search. Full-time fits when the role is stable and you want a single owner for the next multi-year chapter.
When you need senior GTM judgement and a running system now, but the full-time CMO brief is still evolving, stage, channel mix, or team shape is not stable enough for a £150k hire.
When the constraint map is clear, the weekly cadence runs without the founder, and you want a permanent executive owning vendor strategy, hiring, and board narrative long term.
Often yes, we help define the bar, interview for system-building ability, and hand over dashboards and decision rules so the hire starts with context.
For the full side-by-side of the two models — cost, ramp, risk, and when each fits — Fractional CMO vs full-time CMO on danieljohnson.xyz.
Next step
Bring your numbers. In 20 minutes we'll tell you whether fractional, full-time, or neither is the right next hire.
Different stages need different evidence, systems and support. Choose the description that sounds closest to your company right now.
You have customers or early traction, but growth remains inconsistent, founder-led or difficult to reproduce.
Identify the binding growth constraint and build a repeatable learning and acquisition rhythm.